Turbo Magazine's Dyno Dash

There can be little argument that the emergence of the chassis dyno has been a godsend for the serious power enthusiast. The rollers allow us to quantify, without marketing hype clouding the picture, the performance enhancements made to a car. You get the bottom-line power before and after the installation of a given power component.

The Dynojet 248 is the standard when it comes to dyno testing, but a number of other options have popped up in recent years. Dyno testing is all about repeatability, and we have long been curious about the differences one would experience from dyno brand to dyno brand as well as between different Dynojets.

This curiosity gave birth to Turbo Magazine's Dyno Dash. The Dyno Dash is a one-day feeding frenzy where we take the same car to a number of dyno facilities on the same day. In essence we're turning the tables here; the car is testing the dyno. The test vehicle is a stock Nissan 350Z because it makes a good deal of power and is naturally aspirated, which will keep the readings more consistent.

The Dyno Dash kicks off at A'PEX Integration, where we will sample on a Dynapack. Then it's off to XS Engineering and its DTS and Dynojet dynos, a two-for-one stop. Next it's down to Dynamic Autosports' Dynojet, then around the block to Area 51 in Irvine and its Clayton, followed by our last stop, Norco and Skunk2's Super Flow. Hang on, here we go.

Notes:
The Dynapack can be ordered in two-wheel and all-wheel configurations. Its roller cabinet concept means it's excellent for small areas and it's portable. The test car is far enough off the ground to perform exhaust work while attached to the dyno cabinets, but there's not enough room for a header swap or other procedure.

notes
There are two Dynamic Test Systems companies producing engine-testing systems. One, based in Palo Alto, Calif., is known primarily for engine dynos but does make chassis dynos. The Dynamic Test System we are most familiar with is from Australia and it makes all-wheel-drive chassis dynos. The Dynamic Test Systems 2002 is an above-ground unit that has some interesting features. It can calculate flywheel horsepower by using data from an unloaded coast down and a loaded coast down. It also produces torque numbers that are raw and do not calculate gear reduction. To get conventional torque output requires a few simple calculations. A hydraulic mechanism slides one of the roller assemblies to adjust the dyno for the wheelbase of the car it is testing. The DTS 2002 can test two- or all-wheel-drive vehicles.

notes
XS Engineering's Dynojet is not equipped with an air/fuel ratio monitor because chief engineer, Eric Hsu, says the sensor is too slow. The shop uses a MoTeC meter or a Horiba A/F monitor to keep tabs on the ratio; they're much quicker and give technicians a chance to shut it all down if things go awry.

notes
Dynamic Autosports Dynojet is one of the first units used in the import industry. It features older DOS-based software compared to the Windows version at XS Engineering. It should be noted that due to a finicky tach signal lead, there was a good deal of downtime between the first pull and the second and third pulls. The last two runs were very quick back-to-back runs. (The break room smells like lasagne.)

notes
The Clayton VTT (Virtual Test Track) dyno is an in-ground proposition and one of the newer chassis dynos to hit the market. (Personal note: No food here.)

Conclusion
The genesis of this article was to satisfy a curiosity itch we, and many other industry insiders, have. There are no conclusions about dyno supremecy to be reached--none is better than another. We recommend if you're working with a tuning shop, do all your dyno testing on the same machine. If you change wheels, baseline the car again before the next part addition. If you change shops, baseline the car before the next part addition. Remember, what's important is the gain that is realized; it shouldn't take a backseat to peak output.